Please enable JavaScript in your browser.

Our neighbor calls the Unionist “the pattern of newspaper perfection"

Charles C. Burleigh

The Unionist 1833-08-08

Home
>
Items
>
Issue 2
>
Our neighbor calls the Unionist “the pattern of newspaper perfection"

Unionist content

Transcription

Our neighbor calls the Unionist “the pattern of newspaper perfection." We hope he will imitate the “pattern” in point of “independence,” so far at least as to copy the reply of Mr. May to the letter of Messrs. Adams and Judson, since we have inserted their letter in our columns.

About this Item

Charles Burleigh again says that Holbrook's claim to print both sides of the Canterbury controversy had been made disingeuously

Item Details

See Full Metadata Hide Full Metadata
Title
Our neighbor calls the Unionist “the pattern of newspaper perfection"
Description
Debate with Windham Advertiser
Bibliographic Citation
The Unionist 1833-08-08
Creator
Charles C. Burleigh
Full Issue Sequence Number
1833-08-08 p02.18
Type
Text
Language
English
Publisher
The Unionist
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Subject
Journalistic Debate
Source
The Unionist
Original Item
sjsu-library.github.io
Identifier
unionist--text-0032
Category
Unionist content
Issue
2
Related People
Samuel J. May; Andrew Judson; Rufus Adams
Related image
unionist--image-0316

Illustration of a man on horseback losing his balance

Illustration of imperfection from Holbrook's most celebrated publication, <em>Ten Years Among the Mailbags</em>. He had not lost his social intolerance, though; on the first page of the Introduction, he says that if every letter in the mailbag "possessed the power of uttering audibly the ideas which it contains, a confusion of tongues would ensue, worthy of the last stages of the tower of Babel, or of a Woman's Rights convention."

Above: Illustration of imperfection from Holbrook's most celebrated publication, Ten Years Among the Mailbags. He had not lost his social intolerance, though; on the first page of the Introduction, he says that if every letter in the mailbag "possessed the power of uttering audibly the ideas which it contains, a confusion of tongues would ensue, worthy of the last stages of the tower of Babel, or of a Woman's Rights convention."